مقالههای Ahmad Tajedin
توجه: محتویات این صفحه به صورت خودکار پردازش شده و مقالههای نویسندگانی با تشابه اسمی، همگی در بخش یکسان نمایش داده میشوند.
اطلاعات انتشار: Academic Journal of Surgery، اول،شماره۱-۲، ۲۰۱۴، سال ۰
تعداد صفحات: ۵
A 53–year–old man, who underwent total gastrectomy and esophagojejunostomy due to gastric cancer, came back to the emergency ward with delayed intra–abdominal haemorrhage. The patient was suffering from a distended, painful abdomenn. The patient was hypotensive, tachycardic, and oliguric. Laboratory analysis detected severe reduced haemoglobin concentration and coagulopathy. After resuscitation and correction of coagulopathy, the patient was transferred to the operating room. At the emergency operation we found that intra–abdominal haemorrhage was from the transverse mesocolon and site of celiac lymph node dissection. Haemostasis was done by suturing, cauterization, and patches with Surgicel.
نویسنده(ها): Ali Ghorbani Abdehgah، Komeil Mirzaei Baboli، Mohammad Ashouri، Ahmad Tajedin، Keivan Gohari Moghadam
اطلاعات انتشار: Academic Journal of Surgery، دوم،شماره۱-۲، ۲۰۱۵، سال ۰
تعداد صفحات: ۴
Background: Tracheostomy is a procedure which aims at better managing patients’ airway. It can be done using two methods: standard and percutaneous. The percutaneous method is a favorable choice for critically ill– patients because it is a less invasive procedure. This study compares the short–term complications of these two methods (during 7 days after the procedure).Methods: This study was a cross–sectional research performed on 50 ICU patients in need of tracheostomy. The patients were divided into two groups of percutaneous procedure (15 patients) and standard procedure (35 patients). The complications were registered in questionnaires and the data were analyzed using SPSS software (χ² test and t–test).Results: The two groups had no significant difference in age, sex, and vital signs. Average duration of the procedure was 24.4 minutes in the standard procedure (10–45 minutes) and 26.78 minutes (5–70 minutes) in the percutaneous procedure, and there was no significant difference between two groups (P = 0.814). Average bleeding during 7 days after the procedure was 44 cc (10–150 cc) in standard procedure and 24.7 cc (10–50 cc) in the percutaneous procedure, and the difference was significant (P = 0.012). The other variables were not significantly different in two groups.Conclusions: There was no difference in short–term complications between percutaneous and standard tracheostomy method should be selected considering other important factors.
نویسنده(ها): Ali Ghorbani، Abdegah، Reza Ershadi، Amir Reza Radmard، Keivan Gohari، Moghadam، Abbas Sadat، Safavi، Ahmad Tajedin، Alireza Bagheri
اطلاعات انتشار: Academic Journal of Surgery، دوم،شماره۳-۴، ۲۰۱۵، سال ۰
تعداد صفحات: ۴
Background: Localized interlobar effusions in congestive heart failure (phantom or vanishing lung tumor\s) are uncommon but well–known entities. Case Report: The patient is a 60–year–old male with a history of dyspnea and surgical removal of kidney stone in 1 year ago. Results: In chest–X–ray prior to the surgery an olive–shaped homogenous density, with a size of 30 mm × 20 mm in the right lung have been detected. Computed tomography (CT) scan has been performed, and a homogenous mass with a well–delineated border in major fissure of the right lung and mediastinal lymphadenopathy had been detected. Serial CT scans revealed mass enlargement. In Ct guided, Transthoracic biopsy fluid collection along the major fissure of the right lung had been detected. Biopsy of mediastinal lymph node silicoanthracotic changes with focal hyaline fibrosis had been shown.Conclusions: The diagnosis of the phantom tumor must be considered in any patient with congestive heart failure and lung mass. In this patient, there was no history of congestive heart failure which shows that phantom tumor could happen in non–chronic heart failure patients. Although the accurate diagnosis of the phantom tumor with imaging modalities in patients without congestive heart failure is very difficult but at least this diagnosis must be considered in a patient with a lung mass in the major fissure of the lungs.
نمایش نتایج ۱ تا ۳ از میان ۳ نتیجه